 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jackson v. State, No. 433, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of defendant's postconviction relief motion seeking to overturn his guilty verdict and death sentence was affirmed, despite the State's Brady violation, as the evidence against him was overwhelming.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Sec'y of the DOT v. Baynard, C.A. No. 97C-10-045, C.A. No. 97C-10-046,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, February 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State was entitled to summary judgment in condemnation action, where defendants waived "uneconomic remnant" issue by failing to raise it in their answer, and in any event parcel in question was not an uneconomic remnant.
|
|||||
| State v. Didomenicis, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a motion seeking a second suppression hearing was filed so close to the final case review date and trial date as to make it practically impossible to rearrange court schedules, much less the burden on the witnesses, the motion was denied.
|
|||||
| Gentile v. Singlepoint Fin., Inc., C.A. No. 17755,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion for reargument of the denial of his motion for advancement of costs in his suit against defendant company was denied, as it had no basis in law or fact.
|
|||||
| H.K. Griffith, Inc. v. Bethard, C.A. No. 00A-06-003-PLA,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Delaware Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision to grant appellee unemployment benefits was improper, because the board erred in excluding relevant evidence concerning appellee's pattern of absenteeism.
|
|||||
| Klink v. Shahan, C.A. No. 99-11-012,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 9, 2001, Submitted , February 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision in license revocation proceeding was affirmed where there was substantial evidence to support hearing officer's conclusion that driver refused chemical test.
|
|||||
| Mooney v. Shahan, C.A. NO. 00-02-090,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Driver was not prejudiced by alleged deficiency of an incomplete record, and absence of a complete record was not the same as absence of any record. Nor was he prejudiced by the absence of police officer's notes at the hearing.
|
|||||
| State v. Burton, Court of Common Pleas C.A. No. 9701004864,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While there were clearly some issues about defense counsel's approach to the proceedings, he did not the commit offenses charged. However, failures did not influence guilt phase of trial or affect sentence imposed.
|
|||||
| Ganski v. Sussex County Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, Civil Action No. 00A-02-002,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Delaware zoning board did not abuse discretion in denying application for medical special use exception where applicant presented no evidence that adjoining properties would not be adversely affected.
|
|||||
| State v. Ifriqi, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to suppress statements made to police was granted where, given degree of defendant's obvious intoxication, court found that defendant did not knowingly and intelligently waive his Miranda rights.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
