 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Taylor v. Arden Court, C.A. No. 06A-06-008 MMJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Unemployment insurance benefits claimant's appeal from appeals referee's decision that affirmed the denial of benefits was properly held to be untimely by Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board because it was not filed within 10 days as required by Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 3318(c) and the decision of the referee was not returned as "undeliverable."
|
|||||
| White v. State, No. 409, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied defendant's Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reopen his forfeiture case, as he failed to show he was entitled to relief regarding the forfeiture of his vehicle due to his criminal activity and Delaware law prohibited from using that motion as a substitute for a timely-filed appeal, which is what he was trying to do.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
