 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Martinez v. Propak Logistics, LLC, No. 576, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 4, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| NAMA Holdings, LLC v. World Mkt. Ctr. Venture, LLC, No. 553, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 4, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Colon, ID. No. 0501004460,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 4, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Chambers v. State, No. 312, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 5, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because both a speedy trial and a Batson claim were untimely asserted under both Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 29(c) and 33, they were properly denied. Moreover, given that defendant's alleged newly discovered evidence would not have affected the outcome of his trial, said evidence did not afford him a basis for relief.
|
|||||
| Felix v. State, No. 150, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 5, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon a fourth conviction for driving under the influence, defendant's fifth motion to correct an illegal sentence was properly denied pursuant to Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 35(a), as: (1) his voluntary guilty plea waived any error prior to the entry of said plea; and (2) Del. Code Ann. tit. 21, § 4177(d)(4) did not operate as an ex post facto law.
|
|||||
| Owens v. State, No. 440, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 5, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for manslaughter was affirmed because, while the sentence was in excess of the truth in sentencing guidelines, it was within the statutory limits, and there were two major aggravating factors (the killing stemmed from a substantial drug offense and defendant armed himself with a gun in anticipation of the drug deal).
|
|||||
| In re SS&C Techs., Inc. S'holders Litig., Consolidated C.A. No. 1525-VCL,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 6, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| St. Louis v. State, Def. ID # 0009015005 (R-2),
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 6, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's second motion for postconviction relief was denied because his claims were barred procedurally under Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(i) as he did not timely assert them or assert them in his first motion for postconviction relief, and he did not overcome the procedural default with his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
| State v. Martin, Def. I.D.: 0710012907,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 6, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
