 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beal Bank v. Lucks, C.A. No. 14896,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for plaintiff against partnership and general partner for deficiency due on defaulted construction loan note, as claim was timely and had not been released or waived by settlement agreement.
|
|||||
| Di Loreto v. Tiber Holding Corp., C.A. No. 16564,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court awarded shareholders an amount for each share of common stock subject to mandatory buyback provision in corporation's bylaws. Amount was subject to corporation's setoff against certain judgments against shareholders.
|
|||||
| Parnes v. Bally Entm't Corp., C.A. No. 15192,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court ordered judgment for merged public corporations and their boards in a challenge by an acquired corporation's shareholder. Shareholder did not overcome a presumption the merger was rational, informed, and complied with duty of due care.
|
|||||
| State v. Piper, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for postconviction relief was denied where movant's guilty plea constituted a waiver of his right to complain of illegal detention or due process violations, and movant failed to prove ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
| State v. Velasquez, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred as defendant waived his right to assert the claim that he was denied access to the Mexican Consulate as he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered a guilty plea.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
