 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Freudenberg Spunweb Co. v. Fibervisions L.P., C.A. No. 04C-03-073-FSS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where parties' contract called for supplier to provide fiber that met contract specifications, not buyer's desire for better fiber, any express warranty created by Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, ¿ 2-313(1), was satisfied; supplier provided fiber in amounts specified by contract, rather than enough to meet buyer's production needs, so there was no breach.
|
|||||
| N & P Partners, LLC v. Council of Unit Owners of Bayberry Woods Condo., C.A. No. 2317-S,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a condominium declaration allowed the developers the right to expand a condominium development for a period of seven years, after which they had to first seek permission from the condominium association council, the council was owed compensation where the developers expanded without the necessary permission.
|
|||||
| State v. Donahue, CA. # 05A-02-007-FSS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since substantial evidence, including testimony by both parties' medical experts and a video tape of intermittent portions of the employee's work day, supported the industrial accident board's award of workers' compensation, the board's decision was affirmed; remand for the employer to tie its medical expert's opinion to the video was refused.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
