 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Deeds v. State, No. 481, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which defendant minor was adjudicated delinquent of disorderly conduct in violation of Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 1301, it was reasonable for family court to find that defendant's conduct fell within the scope of § 1301(1)(b), where defendant admitted yelling at a group of girls and admitted that she called one of the girls a "bitch."
|
|||||
| Hall v. State, Cr. ID No. 0506014139,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon remand from the Delaware Supreme Court, the court found that defendant's decision to pursue an appeal pro se was knowing and voluntary as defendant was aware of his right to court-appointed counsel but chose to proceed himself because a public defender would be unable to take the same interest he had in his case and defendant was a paralegal.
|
|||||
| Lundeen v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers, No. 508, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion to amend expert report after discovery period ended was not abuse of discretion. Appellants contended expert's opinion changed after learning about existence and contents of two documents, but trial had court found appellee did not wrongfully withhold documents from appellants, and one document was publicly on file with SEC.
|
|||||
| Openwave Sys. v. Harbinger Capital Ptnrs. Master Fund I, Ltd., C.A. No. 2690-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was denied in Delaware General Corporation Law § 225 action as outcome might depend on equities. Hedge funds argued that corporation's board of directors allowed confusing bylaws to persist in order to make stockholder nominations more difficult, but hedge funds might have had reasonable opportunity to submit their nominations.
|
|||||
| Potts v. State, No. 334, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the victim consented to fight defendant, she did not consent to being blind-sided by defendant's brother or to being attacked by defendant with a deadly weapon; therefore, it was clear from the record that a consent instruction under Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 452 was not supported by the evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
