 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Charbonneau v. State, No. 253/256, 2004 [Consolidated],
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was entitled to new murder trial where trial court abused its discretion by denying defendant's motion to admit accomplice's plea and proffer into evidence after State, after jury selection had begun, announced its intention not to call the accomplice to testify, as proffer was relevant under Del. R. Evid. 401 to impeach other accomplice.
|
|||||
| Humes v. State, Cr. ID No. 0402006855,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prothonotary's acceptance of nolle prosequi of appeal was clerical mistake under Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 36 as defendant was convicted in trial court and under Del. C.P. Ct. Crim. R. 48(a), Delaware Attorney General could only file nolle prosequi with leave of court in which defendant was convicted. Nolle prosequi was void ab initio.
|
|||||
| In re Real Estate of Jamie's L.L.C., C.M. NO. 10810-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the partition case, respondent was not entitled to greater than an equal share of the property despite the use of his funding to buy a parcel of the property. He intended this as a gift to petitioner's predecessor, as the parcel was titled in a way that indicated equal ownership, and the profits from leases on the parcel were shared equally.
|
|||||
| In re Real Estate of Michele S. Burns v. Marinis, No. 11671-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although respondent's failure to respond to petitioner's request for admissions was deemed under Del. Ch. Ct. R. 36 to be an admission that a mother was not due any proceeds from the sale of a property and that petitioner was entitled to the available funds, those admissions were not binding on the mother.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
