Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Delaware - March 6 - March 7, 2007

  
Alladi v. Vadlamani, No. 281, 2006, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Drake v. Hudson, No. 433, 2006, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Jones v. State, No. 482, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant met burden of making prima facie showing State purposefully exercised peremptory challenges in racially discriminatory manner and trial judge found prosecutor offered race-neutral reason for strikes; however, remand was necessary because trial judge did not determine if defendant carried burden of proving purposeful discrimination.

Search Cases for Free

  
Jurbala v. State, No. 315, 2006, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a probationer never appealed from the Del. Code Ann, tit. 11, ? 4204(k) violation of probation proceedings, and because the probationer could not establish cause for the procedural default or prejudice, Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(i)(3) acted as a bar to his belated claims.

Search Cases for Free

  
Raymond v. State, No. 309, 2006, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because defendant acted intentionally during the course of fighting with the police and caused physical injury, as defined by Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, ? 222(23), by breaking a police officer's hand, the evidence was sufficient to establish each element of a charge of second-degree assault under Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, ? 612(a)(3).

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Gudzelak, Crim. I.D. No. 0407020818, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Although a judge had previously represented defendant in a civil matter, defendant waived any claim of bias or prejudice; therefore, because defendant failed to demonstrate that the judge was impartial or that there was a conflict of interest under Del. Judges' Code Jud. Conduct Canon 3(C)(1), he was not entitled to postconviction relief.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Malinovskaya, IN-05-01-0437-0438, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion to quash a subpoena concerning an alleged Russian language e-mail was denied as any attorney-client privilege was waived when defense counsel provided an English translation in a previous trial. The motions to quash subpoenas for testimony from defense counsel were granted as the court declined to apply the crime/fraud exception.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Ortiz, ID No. 0602006591, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Sturgis v. Bayside Health Assoc., C.A. No. 04C-06-139 MMJ, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court found regarding next friend's Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 59(a) motion for a new trial that no reason existed to revisit pre-trial ruling that limited the next friend's expert to opinions properly supported by well-recognized scientific principles sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance, and, thus, motion was denied.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Hickman, I.D. No. 0605026650, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Motion to suppress statement to police was denied in theft case because defendant's question to detective as to whether he was allowed to have a lawyer present for interrogation was an equivocal invocation of right to counsel, and the detective properly clarified defendant's wishes before proceeding in compliance with Del. Const. art. I, ? 7.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top