 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Del. Bldg. Supply, Inc. v. Barclay Farms Cmty., LLC, C.A. No: 08L-08-074 (RBY),
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, March 16, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a supplier reasonably believed that the current owner was the owner, or at least the reputed owner, of the property, the supplier satisfied Del. Code Ann. tit. 25, ¿ 2712 by naming the reputed owner in its mechanics' lien complaint; therefore, the former owner was not a necessary party to the action under Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 19.
|
|||||
| Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Delmarva Power & Light Co., C.A. No. 06C-10-225 RRC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 16, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a subrogation case arising from a fire at an apartment building, plaintiffs' "Motion for Sanctions Due to Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence" was denied. The evidence did not suggest that a power company's "troubleman" knew or should have known at the time he disposed of a service cable that it was relevant to a legal dispute.
|
|||||
| Novkovic v. Paxson, C.A. No. 07C-10-248-WCC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 16, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motorist and his wife awarded judgment against a vehicle owner were entitled to pre-judgment interest, under Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, ¿ 2301(d), because a letter to the owner's counsel seeking the owner's liability policy limits was a written settlement demand valid for at least 30 days in a sum less than the damages on which judgment was entered.
|
|||||
| State v. Hoyle, Def. ID # 0603026561,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 16, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Waples v. State, No. 33, 2009,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 16, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to relief pursuant to Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 35(a) when a trial court allegedly failed to give him proper presentence confinement credit because credit for time served was not an appropriate basis for relief from an allegedly illegal sentence under the narrow function of Rule 35(a).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
