 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lynch v. City of Rehoboth Beach, No. 424, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City met any burden of producing evidence under Del. Code Ann. tit. 22, § 303 as the commissioners clearly articulated findings that supported their conclusion that the rezoning of the owners' property conformed to the plan and promoted the health and general welfare of the City's citizens.
|
|||||
| Rodgers v. State, No. 371, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant did not raise any issues for consideration on direct appeal, pursuant to Del. R. Sup. Ct. 26(c), defendant's appeal was wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issue; therefore, his counsel's motion to withdraw was moot, and the State's motion to affirm was granted.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Smith, No. 232, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claimant's appeal in custody suit had to be dismissed; claimant could not challenge judgment awarding custody of triplets to former domestic partner claiming former domestic partner lacked a legal relationship to them after having successfully argued an entitlement to child support because former domestic partner had a legal duty to support them.
|
|||||
| UniSuper Ltd. v. News Corp., Civil Action No. 1699-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the corporate officers' actions were taken in their role as fiduciaries, a company demonstrated good cause why the attorney-client privilege should not apply; therefore, the officers were ordered to produce to the company unredacted copies of the documents provided for in camera inspection, and to produce certain witnesses for deposition.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
