 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hardin v. State, No. 444, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Asbestos Litig., C.A. NO. 05C-05-246-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-250-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-07-206-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-262-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-176-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-07-178-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-142-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-06-083-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-07-124-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-05-203-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-06-215-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-05-274-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-07-223-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-248-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-07-248-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-249-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-06-341-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-06-057-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-05-273-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-06-029-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-162-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-06-216-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-061-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 04C-09-122-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-09-214-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-220-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-07-109-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-260-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-06-067-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-05-329-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-05-242-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-05-270-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-261-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-218-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-05-302-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-05-341-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-05-272-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-05-247-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-08-285-JRS (ASB), C.A. NO. 05C-06-176-JRS (ASB).,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied the companies' motions to dismiss for forum non conveniens, as the companies did not show that the claimants' asbestos cases should be transferred to some alternative forum for judicial review because they were unable to show that they would have to endure "overwhelming hardship" by litigating the cases in Delaware.
|
|||||
| In re J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. S'holder Litig. v. Harrison, No. 218, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Shareholders' proxy disclosure claim was properly dismissed, as: (1) such was derivative and not direct; (2) the claim failed to state a cognizable claim as to any compensable harm to the class; and (3) the entity allegedly benefiting from an alleged dilution was not a significant or controlling stockholder, but was the successor corporation.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. State, No. 479, 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While an order revoking probation was affirmed on appeal, upon the State's concession, the matter was remanded for the Superior Court to impose a credit to all time the probationer served at Level V for a drug possession conviction between October, 2002 and June, 2003.
|
|||||
| Schetrom v. State, No. 512, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State's motion to affirm judgment of conviction was granted. Court reviewed record and concluded, under Del. Sup. Ct. R. 26(c), that defendant's appeal was without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issue. Court was also satisfied that appellate counsel had properly determined that defendant could not raise meritorious claim in the appeal.
|
|||||
| Setting v. New Castle County, C.A. No. 05A-05-008-JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation hearing officer properly denied former county police officer's petition for total disability benefits as officer was never found totally disabled by any doctor, he declined sedentary position with county that fit his physical capability, and only job limitation from the officer's own physician was that he not wear a gun belt.
|
|||||
| Webb v. Carroll, No. 425, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an inmate's contentions under Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, §§ 6906(a), 6907(a) that the trial court improperly failed to bring him into court and that he was entitled to damages because the trial court failed to follow the proper procedures were incorrect as a matter of law, the trial court properly denied the inmate's habeas corpus petition.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
