 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Amaro v. State, No. 588, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's untimely appeal was dismissed, as he could not show it was due to court-related personnel, which was the only exception to the mandatory timely filing rule.
|
|||||
| Dorman v. State, No. 46, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly found to have violated his probation, as he received a prompt hearing before the superior court and deferred punishment for his prior convictions, and he was not prosecuted directly for the violation.
|
|||||
| Kimpel v. Del. Pub. Auto Auction, C.A. No. 2000-02-224,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Service contract alone did not negate implied warranties since vehicle was not fit to be used upon public highways. Contract administrator was not liable under service contract for repairs.
|
|||||
| Patterson v. State, No. 574, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pauls v. State, No. 520, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's claim of wrongful application of possession of deadly weapon statute was denied when not brought within three years of entry of final judgment of conviction.
|
|||||
| SMITH v. STATE, No. 62, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of criminal conviction was dismissed. Appellant did not demonstrate that untimeliness of notice of appeal was attributable to court-related personnel.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, No. 62, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's notice of appeal was dismissed as untimely filed, because there was no indication the failure to timely file was attributable to court-related personnel, which was the only exception to the timely filing rule.
|
|||||
| State v. Weedon, CRA. Nos: 93-01-0052; 0054; 0053, 0056-R1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the defendant failed to show that he was surprised by and was unable to meet the testimony presented by his wife and a third party, defendant was not entitled to a new trial after this testimony was recanted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
