 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pettit v. Country Life Homes, Inc., C.A. No. 03C-03-026-RFS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 31, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stacey v. People's Settlement, C.A. No. 08A-06-011 PLA,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 31, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a teacher did not read a claims deputy's notice of determination, and because she was responsible for failing to timely file an appeal under Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 3318(b), the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board properly declined to exercise jurisdiction under Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 3320(a) sua sponte to hear the merits of her claim.
|
|||||
| State v. Camacho, I.D. # 0708025863,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 31, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant never indicated that he had any difficulty understanding a translator, and because he indicated on the truth-in-sentencing guilty plea form that he was fully satisfied with defense counsel's representation, defendant failed to make the requisite showing that counsel was ineffective and that he was prejudiced thereby.
|
|||||
| State v. Johnson, I.D. No. 9908026980,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 31, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's motion for postconviction relief was untimely, because his decision to accept a guilty plea was based upon his incriminating statement to the police and his prior criminal record, defendant's claims did not warrant consideration pursuant to the fundamental fairness exception of Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(i)(5).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
