Delaware, March, 2004, State Case law

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

State Courts - Delaware - March 12, 2004

Andrus v. State, No. 190, 2003, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 12, 2004, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Defendant was denied postconviction relief where, inter alia, counsel's failure to seek suppression of statements did not prejudice defendant and any error in failing to seek suppression of prosecutor's statements regarding remorse was harmless.

Search Cases for Free

Ayers v. State, No. 623, 2002, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 12, 2004, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Trial court properly instructed the jury on accomplice liability of defendant, as the evidence supported theories of defendant's guilt as a principal or an accomplice to a murder; the denial of a unanimity instruction on defendant's role was proper.

Search Cases for Free

Confin Int'l Invs., Inc. v. AT&T Corp., C.A. No. 19997, COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 12, 2004, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted because the minority stockholder did not suffer any special injury where the diminution in value of the corporation was an injury suffered equally by all of the corporation's stockholders.

Search Cases for Free

State v. Muto, I.D. No.: 0305008627, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 12, 2004, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Defendant's motion to dismiss an indictment for threats against a public official was denied because the statute which contained the offense was neither overbroad, nor vague as applied to defendant, nor vague on its face.

Search Cases for Free

White v. State, No. 359, 2003, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 12, 2004, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Where defendant did not comply with the rules of a rehabilitation program, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by finding that defendant violated the conditions of his probation.

Search Cases for Free

Communities Portal