 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ingram v. Messina Mel, Inc., No. 419, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sanders v. Lewis, No. 59, 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shaw v. State, No. 538, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: DUI conviction was affirmed; evidence presented at trial was sufficient to establish defendant was driver of vehicle involved in accident, police officer smelled alcohol on defendant's breath, defendant admitted to drinking before driving, and defendant was unable to recite the alphabet past the letter "B" before starting to transpose letters.
|
|||||
| State v. Strickland, I.D. No.0607017802,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the similarities between the six incidents were sufficient evidence under Del. R. Evid. 404(b) to demonstrate a common scheme or plan, and because defendant was not prejudiced and conceded that the offenses were properly joined under Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 8, his Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 14 motion to sever the charges was denied.
|
|||||
| In re Snead, Defendant ID No. 0105002628,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mehiel v. Solo Cup Co., C.A. No. 06C-01-169-JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court granted cup company's motion to dismiss count one alleging fraudulent inducement, count two alleging fraudulent inducement, count three alleging breach of contract pertaining to the St. Thomas facility, and count five alleging unjust enrichment, as those matters already had been presented in and resolved in arbitration.
|
|||||
| Ragland v. State, No. 499, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant was not entitled to the return of money that had been seized from his person at the time of his arrest for marijuana possession because he was given proper notice of the forfeiture proceedings under Del. Code Ann. tit. 16, § 4784 and Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 71.3(c) and his petition was not filed within 45 days as required.
|
|||||
| Troy Corp. v. Schoon, C.A. No. 1959-VCL,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Investment banking entities' motion to dismiss under Del. Ch. Ct. R. 12(b)(3) a manufacturer's breach of contract and related fiduciary duty claims was denied because the forum selection clause in an agreement between the parties was inapplicable, and the manufacturer's suit was properly maintainable in the chancery court where it was commenced.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
