 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fortt v. State, No. 618, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed convictions of armed robbery and attempted robbery. Admission of a gun not linked with the incidents was harmless abuse of discretion. Denial of motion to sever the charges was not an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| Manis v. State, No. 148, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where first judge agreed to defer to sentence contained in plea agreement, second judge may have improperly imposed greater sentence. Matter was remitted for determination of whether sentence exceeded that provided for in agreement.
|
|||||
| Mullen v. State, No. 403, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentences on forgery convictions after he violated probation were affirmed. Trial court was only required to credit defendant with any period of actual incarceration, not his period of quasi-incarceration.
|
|||||
| Powell v. State, No. 496, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion for postconviction relief was affirmed. Defendant's claim was procedurally barred, and he failed to show cause for relief and prejudice from violation of rights. He entered into guilty plea knowingly and voluntarily.
|
|||||
| Santiago v. State, No. 483, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Smith & Wesson Corp. v. Sills, No. 87, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Gregory, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's postconviction claims were procedurally barred because defendant did not raise them in proceedings leading to the judgment of conviction and he had not shown that an exception to the bar existed.
|
|||||
| State v. Jamison, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defense counsel's performance was reasonable because she could not have proved that large buckshot would not kill anyone and that firing sawed-off shotgun loaded with large shot directly at another person merely constituted criminal negligence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
