 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Leung v. Schuler, C.A. No. 17089,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 29, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stockholder's derivative and class action suits against corporation and directors alleging that issuance of shares to insiders was invalid, constituted waste of assets, violated duties of care and loyalty was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Miranda v. Dupont, C.A. No. 99A-04-015 WCC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee was not a prima facie displaced worker for disability purposes as her employment opportunities had not dramatically changed due to work-related injury. Employee did not make reasonable efforts in securing new job.
|
|||||
| Moseley v. Board of Assessment Review & New Castle County, C.A. No. 99A-09-007 CG,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 29, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No part of property leased to golf course developer remained eligible for tax breaks pursuant to Delaware's Farmland Assessment Program.
|
|||||
| Moseley v. Board of Assessment Review & New Castle County, C.A. No. 99A-09-008 CG,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, February 29, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: County assessor improperly assessed improvement to property, to be developed into a golf course, where it presented no evidence of the value of the irrigation system but considered all construction as special betterments.
|
|||||
| Mosley v. State, No. 451, 1998,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reasonable suspicion to search, and probable cause to seize crack cocaine, existed where officer received information about undercover buy, and could feel rocky substance in defendant's brassiere; suppression properly denied.
|
|||||
| Pierce v. State, No. 400, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant was not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus where he was tried by a court of competent jurisdiction, convicted and sentenced. Appellant's appeal was without merit as settled Delaware law controlled the issues.
|
|||||
| Public Water Supply Co. v. DiPasquale, Civil Action No. 98A-02-005,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court remanded the matter back to Environmental Appeals Board (Board) and provided guidance on legal issues. Court was reluctant to base a ruling on issues and theories not considered by the agency or the Board below.
|
|||||
| Sewell v. Delaware River & Bay Auth., Civil Action No. 99A-07-003,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When industrial injury triggered disability or impairment from latent condition, entire condition was compensable and no attempt to apportion workers' compensation between accident and pre-existing condition could be made.
|
|||||
| State v. Hunter, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence that defendant's fingerprints came back to individual with different name, and improper closing statements of prosecutor that trivialized burden of proof, did not prejudice defendant so as to warrant a new trial.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, No. 285, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the evidence against appellant was primarily impermissible hearsay, there was sufficient competent evidence to support the trial court's finding that appellant violated the terms of her probation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
