 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Custis v. Barr, C.A. No. 04C-05-047 RBY,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landowners had a right to judgment as a matter of law under Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 50(a); worker, as business invitee, did not show that a handrail from which he deliberately swung was defective. He used it in a way that they did not intend, it met code standards, and they met their burden of proof by showing a lack of material facts at issue.
|
|||||
| In re GM (Hughes) S'holder Litig., No. 260, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly took judicial notice under Del. R. Evid. 201 of seller's Form 10-Q filed with Securities and Exchange Commission setting forth results of stockholders' vote on a series of transactions as complaint did not challenge that majority vote of holders of each class of seller's stock voted to approve transactions.
|
|||||
| Lemon v. Favuzza, C.A. No. 05C-07-036MJB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a defendant's counsel miscalculated the deadline in Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 16.1 for filing a request for a trial de novo, the arbitration order was entered as a order of the court; the defendant's motion to reopen the case was denied.
|
|||||
| Simonton v. Simonton, No. 73, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
