 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Joann P. Welsh v. State Clinical & Lab. Physicians, P.A., C.A. No. 98C-06-003(WLW),
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, March 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where jury's verdict was rationally based on one expert's opinion as to standard of care but a different expert's opinion as to cause of death, motion for new trial was denied. Award of costs to prevailing party was discretionary and was denied.
|
|||||
| State Dep't Natural Res. & Envtl. Control (DNREC) v. Murphy, C.A. No. 00A-08-004-JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court reversed a state merit relations employee board decision. The court determined that a seasonal employee who was terminated and reinstated several times was not a classified employee so her termination did not violation the merit rules.
|
|||||
| Best Drywall v. Jennings & Churella Servs., C.A. No. 00L-01-001,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 20, 2001, Date of Decision
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner's summary judgment motion alleging late filing of mechanics' lien denied because subcontractor provided evidence that suggested a different filing date.
|
|||||
| State v. Taylor, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A paper opened and read as part of a routine inventory search was not an illegal search and seizure, and defendant's Miranda rights were not violated when he was asked a question in response to a conversation he initiated.
|
|||||
| Highlands Ins. Group, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., C.A. No. 17971,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Documents prepared by a parent corporation, and used to divest a subsidiary, were unambiguous and construed in favor of subsidiary, in case where parent corporation prepared the documents.
|
|||||
| Pinnacle Energy, L.L.C. v. Price, C.A. No. 2000-02-155,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The customers did not breach a contract for the purchase of windows. They cancelled the contract in a timely manner, where both customers called the window company prior to delivery and cancelled.
|
|||||
| State v. Thompkins, I.D. # 9906019526,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where there was no evidence in postconviction relief motion or in record that supported movant's claim of misinformation by counsel, and contentions of ineffective assistance were conclusory and contrary to evidence on record, motion was denied.
|
|||||
| Caraballo v. State Dep't of Corr., C.A. No. 00C-06-100-JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court dismissed an inmate's claim for failure to provide necessary medical eye care. The state had not purchased insurance for plaintiff's loss, so it was not deemed to have waived sovereign immunity from the tort claim.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Williams, C.M. No. 3174 G-204,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 22, 2001, Final Report
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where court determined partition in kind would have been economically detrimental and physically difficult, partition sale was ordered, but portion was to be added to one party's property before sale, so as not to devalue that property.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
