 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| C.F. Schwartz Motor Co. v. Int'l Truck & Engine Corp., C.A. No. 03C-05-011 HDR,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, March 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a franchisee's contract with a manufacturer only contemplated repairs, the franchisee was a "new motor vehicle dealer" entitled to relief under the Motor Vehicle Franchising Practices Act when the franchise was terminated.
|
|||||
| Cannon v. Pritchard, No. 534, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an injured party did not complete his portion of a pretrial stipulation and did not request a continuance of the trial, the superior court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the case for failure to prosecute.
|
|||||
| Ryland Group v. Santos Carpentry Co., C.A. No.: 00C-09-056 SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: General contractor's tort and contract claims against framing subcontract based on homeowners' allegations of structural defects were time-barred; general contractor could not claim delayed discovery where it failed to properly inspect.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Rite Aid Corp., Civil Action No. 094-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion to expedite a statutory advancement proceeding against a corporation was a superfluous motion where the advancement proceeding was already a summary action. The motion to expedite was denied.
|
|||||
| Burton v. Burton, No. 484, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where, despite notice, a husband did not complete a financial report and did not request an extension, the court did not abuse its discretion in adopting a wife's form of order and awarding her the parties' vehicle.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Brady v. Manufactured Home Cmtys., Inc., No. 537, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a proposed new form of rental agreement was not vague, but was an attempt to expand a landlord's right of entry beyond that granted by statute, the trial court properly determined the "rent cap" issue.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
