 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Abrams v. Sachnoff & Weaver, Ltd., No. 564, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's alleged contract to share fees with class counsel was unenforceable under Emerald Partners v. Berlin because he succeeded his wife as the representative plaintiff in a class action suit and because he did not obtain consent of all class members to waive the conflict of interest pursuant to Del. Law. R. Prof. Conduct 1.7(b)(2).
|
|||||
| Dittrick v. Chalfant, C.A. No. 2156-VCL,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action involving an installment land sale contract, the balance of the equities supported the purchasers' request for specific performance. Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, ¿ 2301(a) supplied the agreement's missing interest rate term, and the purchasers had made substantial improvements and performed a sizable portion of the contract.
|
|||||
| Estate of Rae v. Del. Hosp. for the Chronically Ill, Civil Action No. 05C-01-087 WCC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action relating to their mother's death, daughters were not entitled to a new trial or an additur because the jury's verdict was adequate based on a balancing of the significance of the mother's death with the reality that the daughters were not economically dependent on the mother.
|
|||||
| Teagle v. State, No. 496, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of defendant's Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 32(d) motion to withdraw no contest pleas was proper because, although there was a procedural defect in the plea agreement caused by erroneous advice to defendant by defense counsel and trial court as to minimum prison term, the State cured that defect when it dropped a single robbery count.
|
|||||
| IL Kesef of Del., LLC v. Phillips, Civil Action No. 06C-06-033 WCC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was denied reargument with respect to a prior damage award because the motion was simply a restatement of plaintiff's assertions made during the prior evidentiary hearing; the court had not misapprehended the facts and had not overlooked controlling law or legal precedent or legal arguments made by counsel.
|
|||||
| Medkeff v. State, No. 31, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Deloitte & Touche United States LLP v. Lamela, Civil Action No. 1542-VCP,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Accounting firms proved they had legitimate business interest, ¿ 542.335(b), (c), Fla. Stat., in client: during relevant period, firms received between $ 2,500,000 and $ 8,500,000 per year in revenue; partner billed over 200 hours per year during period, recording 86 hours of unbilled promotional time; and partner was billing partner on account.
|
|||||
| Bailey v. State, No. 7, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's first degree murder by abuse or neglect trial, it abused discretion to let a witness read into evidence the Safe Arms for Babies Law, Del. Code Ann. tit. 16, ¿ 907A(b), (c), letting a parent take an unwanted child to a hospital, to show defendant's mens rea because no evidence showed she knew of the Law, but the error was harmless.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
