 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Office of the Pub. Defender v. Del. State Police, C.A. No.: 01C-09-208-FSS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Delaware's public defender office and one of its individual attorneys lacked standing to obtain state police training manuals by means of a freedom of information action, because they were not citizens and materials were for use in litigation.
|
|||||
| Russo v. Nelson, C.A. No. 01C-08-005,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Condominium owner encroached upon common elements when he expanded rooms and added a porch and deck. Homeowner's council did not have the authority to permit alterations, because property rights could not be deprived without property owner's consent.
|
|||||
| Scheers v. Indep. Newspaper, C.A. No. 02A-05-002 JTV,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, March 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In employer's action seeking termination of total disability benefits an employee was receiving, record supported Delaware Industrial Accident Board's finding that employee could do sedentary work and should be receiving partial disability benefits.
|
|||||
| Shearin v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. 472, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 31, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a "loaner" car was covered by the insured's policy and she did not make a proper claim for loss of her insured vehicle in accordance with the terms of the policy, summary judgment in favor of the insurer was proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
