 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alston v. Hudson, No. 413, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of complaint was proper. Complaint against state appellees failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Jurisdiction over law firm appellees did not exist due to ineffective service of process.
|
|||||
| Anderson v. State, No. 364, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly admitted bad acts evidence at defendant's trial for trafficking in marijuana and other charges; the evidence was relevant to defendant's planning of a continuing scheme for using third parties to secure drug shipments.
|
|||||
| Dupont v. Envirodyne, C.A. No. 96C-04-291-JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Forrester-Smith, Inc. v. Waltz, Civil Action No. 1999-04-074,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Seller denied recovery in suit for amount due for delivery of goods to buyer because goods were defective and seller did not make effective cure by delivery of conforming goods by due date and extended cure date was unreasonable.
|
|||||
| In re Fink, No. 90, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 7, 2000, Submitted , March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was subject to interim suspension for misappropriation of client funds as there was a genuine need to protect the public from the risk of further harm by the attorney.
|
|||||
| Ingram v. Thorpe, No. 545, 1998,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment reversed; agreement of sale between parties was not voidable pursuant to statute requiring certain disclosures be included in contracts of sale as appellee did not attempt to rescind agreement before settlement.
|
|||||
| Paskill Corp. v. Alcoma Corp., No. 321, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In shareholder's appraisal proceeding, valuing corporation by relying on net asset value as sole criterion for determining fair value of stock and deducting speculative future tax liabilities was error.
|
|||||
| State v. Green, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for new trial was denied, as defendant was not prejudiced by prosecution's conduct or comments, given court's curative jury instructions and strength of evidence against him.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
