 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bultron v. State, No. 62, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not err in allowing defendant's counsel to withdraw, in not appointing new counsel for defendant, and in requiring him to proceed pro se, as defendant forfeited his right to counsel under U.S. Const. amend. VI by his serious misconduct towards his attorney, which was abusive and bordered on being violent.
|
|||||
| Hallmon v. C. Raymond Davis & Sons, Inc., C.A.No. 02C-05-317 MJB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion in limine claiming that expert's initial report was not based on valid methodology, was premature; time for taking his deposition was still open. Summary judgment was not in order; genuine issues of material fact were raised by reports of two experts, including the preliminary report, which was valid as it was based on personal knowledge.
|
|||||
| Hallmon v. C. Raymond Davis & Sons, Inc., C.A. No. 02C-05-317 MJB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since there were sufficient factual disputes regarding under whose control a crane operator was acting when an incident of roof trusses falling took place, and there were disputes regarding the negligence of the operator, summary judgment was not appropriate.
|
|||||
| Sears Logistics Servs. v. Falconi, C.A. No. 05A-09-003,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Board's decision to award workers' compensation benefits to claimant was affirmed as there was substantial evidence to support Board's finding that claimant was not on notice of work-related nature until November 2003. Claim was filed within two-year limitations period and was not time-barred under Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 2361(a).
|
|||||
| Thornton v. Meridian Consulting Eng'Rs, C.A. No. 04C-01-001-RFS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An LLC could not prevail on its claim that its contract with plaintiff was based on time and materials to perform the work, as the contract clearly was a fixed price contract, the LLC did not keep reliable time and material records, and it did not prove that the contract was modified or changed from fixed price to time and materials.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
