 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Miller v. State, No. 138, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police and probation officers had reasonable and articulable suspicion to seize defendant for loitering after the surveillance team watched defendant sit on the steps of a vacant business for 20 to 30 minutes, where the building was formerly used in illegal bookmaking operation and the area was known for drug problems and other criminal activity.
|
|||||
| Rizzo v. Joseph Rizzo & Sons Constr. Co., C.A. No. 2551-VCS,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court of Chancery of Delaware had jurisdiction over a shareholder's ejectment action because it was brought derivatively on behalf of a limited liability company under Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-1001 as the action rested on an asserted breach of fiduciary duty and was ancillary to the rest of the shareholder's claims sounding in equity.
|
|||||
| State v. Rutledge, I.D. No. 0610021280,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to dismiss was granted as to charges of possession of child pornography, as defendant had previously pled guilty to child pornography charges arising from the same evidence, and defendant entered into his plea bargain with the expectation that all pending charges would be resolved.
|
|||||
| State v. Tucker, ID # 0608016366,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized in his bedroom was granted where the probation officers conducted an administrative search without making a reasonable attempt to determine whether the co-occupant, a probationer, owned, possessed, or controlled defendant's bedroom.
|
|||||
| Estate of Carpenter v. Dinneen, Civil Action No. 1804-VCP,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An estate's summary judgment motion (Del. Ch. Ct. R. 56) was denied with respect to counterclaims of the decedent's financial advisors, in the estate's action to recover funds allegedly taken from the decedent when she was incompetent. There was sufficient evidence of a possible contractual relationship to support a tortious interference claim.
|
|||||
| State v. Seward, I.D. No. 0608023596,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, April 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Exigent circumstances existed justifying warrantless entry into defendant's residence, as, inter alia, detectives reasonably believed defendant and CI had drug transaction pending, and one detective believed defendant knew he was being set up or would soon discover that he was being set up and would imminently remove or destroy contraband.
|
|||||
| Ramunno v. Capano, No. 476, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
