|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Delaware - July 11, 2005
|
| |
Flight Options Intl v. Flight Options, LLC, C.A. No. 1459-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 11, 2005, Decided; September 20, 2005, Redacted Public Version
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although a minority owner's position in opposing a common unit purchase agreement that would have diluted its equity share in an LLC was not particularly strong, since there was some chance it might prevail in arbitration and since that was the dispute resolution method favored in the LLC agreement, a brief preliminary injunction was allowed.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Pumphrey v. State, No. 419, 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Following defendant's second violation of probation (VOP), the trial court was authorized, under Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, ¿ 4334(c) (2001), to impose the entire Level V term that previously had been suspended, which was 18 months. As such, the 17-month sentence at Level V for defendant's second VOP was less than the maximum punishment allowed.
|
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Farkas, ID # 00501006268,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, July 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant was properly subjected to the registration requirements of Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, ¿ 4120, since the requirement existed when he was adjudicated delinquent due to unlawful sexual contact and, therefore, the reregistration requirements of ¿ 4120(f) continued; defendant had ample notice of the registration requirement.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|