 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hickman v. State, No. 29, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's second motion for postconviction relief was untimely under Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(i)(1)'s three-year statute of limitations because the mandate from his direct appeal issued in June 2002 and the motion was filed in October 2006.
|
|||||
| Spanish Tiles, Ltd. v. Hensey, C.A. No. 05C-07-025-RFS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dispute between competitors, plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery was granted in part and defendants' motion for a protective order was denied because, inter alia, defendants failed to establish good cause for filing late responses under Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 6, 26, 33, and 37, and certain client information could be redacted.
|
|||||
| Viking Pump, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., C.A. No. 1465-VCS,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Contracting party's request to modify an opinion was granted because the request was reasonable and narrowly tailored to the protection of the party's interests. Insurance company's request to excise from the opinion references to documents that its attorneys created was denied as the company did not show the need required to justify the request.
|
|||||
| Gatz v. Ponsoldt, No. 298, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancery court erred in dismissing plaintiffs' claims arising from defendants' actions in relation to the recapitalization of a corporation, because the claims were not exclusively derivative and could have been brought directly, as the recapitalization was actually two separate transactions that defendants caused to be rolled into one.
|
|||||
| In re Howell, No. 126, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an inmate could have appealed either of the trial court's restitution orders, but chose not to do so, the inmate had another adequate remedy available to him; therefore, he was not entitled to the issuance of a writ of certiorari.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
