 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Benson v. State, No. 512, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 23, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bogert v. Eisenhardt, No. 598, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 23, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Chao v. State, No. 510, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 23, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Downes v. State, No.122, 2009,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 23, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Himes v. Gabriel, No. 475, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 23, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the issue of informed consent was factually disputed at trial, because the case was not especially complicated and was within the normal comprehension of the jury, the trial court properly upheld the jury's verdict finding informed consent under Del. Code Ann. tit. 18, § 6852(a)(2).
|
|||||
| Roberts v. Daystar Sills, Inc., No. 6, 2009,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 23, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mitsubishi Power Sys. Ams. v. Babcock & Brown Infrastructure Group Us, C.A. No. 4499-VCL,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 24, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Morgan v. J & J Staffing, C.A. No. 08A-06-003 MJB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 24, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a claimant's failure to receive mail at the address originally given to Department of Labor was because her personal safety was at risk at that address, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board failed to consider whether the interests of justice would be served by allowing her untimely appeal under Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 3320.
|
|||||
| Pollard v. State, No. 1, 2009,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 24, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
