 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Household Bank, F.S.B. v. Daniels, C.A. No. 03L-11-007WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, July 14, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a bank did not fulfill its Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 69(g) duty to make a reasonably diligent effort to ascertain a property owner's correct address, the owner's motion to set aside a sheriff's sale was granted. The bank's efforts were not reasonably calculated to notify the owner of the upcoming sale.
|
|||||
| LaTorre v. State, No. 147, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 14, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Habeas relief was unavailable to appellant where he presented no evidence that trial court lacked jurisdiction to sentence him or that there was irregularity on face of his commitment. Appellant provided no evidence that his plea was coerced or irregular, and his plea bargain also benefited him since several felony charges were dismissed.
|
|||||
| Smith v. First Corr. Med., LLC, C.A. No. 04C-12-028 WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, July 14, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite a need for additional evidence, a medical provider's motion to dismiss an administratrix's 42 U.S.C.S. ¿ 1983 claim against it was denied as sufficient facts were pled to show that the medical provider had a policy or custom of knowingly withholding or providing inadequate health care to inmates based upon financial considerations alone.
|
|||||
| Pearson v. Thomas, C.A. No. 02C-09-028 WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, July 15, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A corporation's motion for reargument and/or reconsideration was denied as the court was satisfied that the corporation received the requisite notice of the proceedings in compliance with Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 15.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
