LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Delaware - April 5 - April 6, 2006

  
Feldman v. Cutaia, C.A. No. 1656-N, COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 5, 2006, Decided , April 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Corporate directors' motion to dismiss a shareholder's derivative action was denied as the shareholder was not required to have made a demand of the directors under Del. Ch. Ct. R. 23.1. Further, the shareholder adequately alleged a claim that a repurchase of options and warrants by the corporation violated Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 160(a)(1).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Levy v. Hayes Lemmerz Int'l, Inc., C.A. No. 1395-N, COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 5, 2006, Decided , April 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Former outside directors' indemnification claims were dismissed as to a new company that emerged from bankruptcy as the new company had no obligation to indemnify the former directors of the old company. The directors' claims were not dismissed as to the old company as they had a right to proceed for indemnification against the old company.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Jackson, Cr. ID No. 92003717DI, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court could not issue stay of execution to allow defendant to pursue certiorari petition before United States Supreme Court (USSC) because federal appellate court rendered final judgment when it denied certificate of appealability, so under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2101(f), stay could only be granted by federal appellate judge or by USSC justice.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
W.L. Gore & Assocs. v. Wu, C.A. No. 263-N, COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The court directed a former employer to submit a revised preliminary injunction as to a breach of a noncompetition agreement and misappropriation of trade secrets action against a former employee. The employee's due process rights under U.S. Const. amend. XIV were not violated by not requiring the employer to disclose information to the employee.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Brown v. State, No. 274, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Warrantless arrest for burglary based on informant's tip that stolen items would be sold at store was proper under Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 1904(b)(1) where police knew informant's identity, tip was corroborated by independent observations of defendant, and defendant was similar to man shown on surveillance tape trying to sell stolen items.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Mundy v. Devon, No. 174, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A family court's denial of a father's petition under Del. Code Ann. tit. 13, § 722 (1999 & Supp. 2004) to modify the parties' consent agreement to alternate their child's primary placement on an annual school-year basis was error where it failed to consider the full spectrum of placement options, including primary placement with the mother.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.