 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mays v. State, No. 493, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 24, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant failed to demonstrate that counsel committed any errors that were prejudicial to him, the trial court properly denied his Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61 motion for postconviction relief.
|
|||||
| State v. Carney, ID # 0510023059A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 24, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant did not allege any prejudice as a result of the post-deadline notification of the statutory aggravating circumstances upon which the State intended to rely, the State's request to rely on the "substantial planning" statutory aggravator in Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 4209(e)(1)(u) was granted.
|
|||||
| State v. Carney, ID # 0510023059A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 24, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Adult defendant's motion to strike death penalty on murder first degree and other charges was denied; defendant's age, sixteen, at time he was convicted of crime that was to be used as an aggravator under Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 4209(e)(1)(i), had no bearing, based on Roper, on the State's ability to use the conviction in seeking death penalty.
|
|||||
| UPS v. Houghton, C.A. No. 06A-03-004 MMJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 24, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A decision of the Delaware Industrial Accident Board denying an employer's petition for review and maintaining a claimant on total disability status (Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 2324) was affirmed. The Board did not err when it accepted the claimant's expert's opinion over the employer's experts' opinion as to the nature of the claimant's disability.
|
|||||
| Warren v. State, No. 477, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 24, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant did not raise any issues for consideration on appeal, upon review of the record, it was determined that his appeal was wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issue; pursuant to Del. Sup. Ct. R. 26(c), the appeal was dismissed, counsel's motion to withdraw was moot, and the judgment was affirmed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
