 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Showell v. Div. of Family Servs., No. 452 and 461, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 1, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A family court lacked jurisdiction to terminate parents' rights in their children because the Division of Family Services did not publish the notice required under Del. Code Ann. tit. 13, § 1107A(g) in the correct county or locality, and the parents did not enter a legal appearance in the family court.
|
|||||
| Torres v. State, No. 504, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 1, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was proper to deny an inmate's motion under Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61 for postconviction relief because it was untimely and was barred, and a United States Supreme Court decision did not create a newly-recognized retroactive right applicable to the inmate as required by Rule 61(i)(1) to prevent a procedural bar.
|
|||||
| Argyle Solutions, Inc. v. Prof'l Sys. Corp., C.A. No. 4382-VCN,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, May 4, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the claims which a mailing company sought to arbitrate accrued more than six months before the filing of the demand for arbitration, in violation of the parties' agreement, a collection agency demonstrating a reasonable probability of success as to its argument that the arbitration was time-barred under Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, § 5702(c).
|
|||||
| Wimbish v. State, No. 213, 2009,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 4, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
