 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Berryman v. State, No. 463, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant an opportunity to plea to lesser included offenses after final case review, where defendant twice rejected a plea offer she ultimately wished to accept, both at initial case review and at final case review, and defendant provided no good cause for excusing the timing of her decision.
|
|||||
| Brokenbrough v. State, No. 432, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial judge was not required answer no to a question from the jury on whether the required element of intentional conduct for assault first degree and attempted robbery required premeditation. The judge's answer was legally correct and did not undermine the jury's ability to intelligently perform its duty.
|
|||||
| LHO New Orleans LM, L.P. v. MHI Leasco New Orleans, Inc., C.A. No. 05C-04-214 SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action based on a lease agreement, summary judgment was granted to defendants when a clause in the agreement unambiguously provided that all judicial actions regarding the agreement or any related transaction were to be brought in either a state or a federal court in Louisiana.
|
|||||
| Maddrey v. State, No. 271, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Sullins, ID. No.0405017780,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to dismiss was denied as state and federal double jeopardy clauses did not bar defendant's retrial after mistrial was declared since trial court and defendant believed that trial court was ruling on defendant's motion and trial court did not rule sua sponte. Defendant was not goaded into seeking mistrial by State.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
