|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Delaware - April 12, 2001
|
| |
Hamilton v. State, Nos. 386, 2000, 415, 2000, CONSOLIDATED,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Petitioner, who was incarcerated for various crimes, had no factual basis for challenging the calculation of his sentence length and thus his appeal was denied.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outdoor Techs. Inc. v. Allfirst Fin., Inc., C.A. No. 99C-09-151-JRS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Without a false statement, claims of fraud, concealment, and negligent misrepresentation failed. Misrepresentation by omission claim required a legally recognized relationship.
|
|
| |
Precision Works, Inc. v. Smith, Cr. A. No. 2000-06-258,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: The contractor was liable for failing to perform the work in a workmanlike manner, where the painting was incomplete, the vinyl flooring was cut too short, and the contractor installed a vinyl door that did not close.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Dawson, IK86-12-0024R2, IK87-01-0841R2, IK87-01-0843R2, IK87-01-0845R2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, April 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In postconviction relief proceedings, justice did not require that an issue that was previously considered and rejected be revisited simply because the claim was refined or restated.
|
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Mundy, Criminal ID 9611005019, Criminal Action No. IN 96-12-0586, R2; and IN 96-12-0587, R2,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's motion for postconviction relief was denied where he failed to prove he had ineffective assistance of counsel, there was no prosecutorial misconduct, his right to counsel was not violated, and the prosecution met its burden of proof.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|