|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Delaware - April 12, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
In re Asbestos Litigation: , Nos. 100, 2005; 101, 2005; 102, 2005; 106, 2005; 107, 2005; and 137, 2005 (CONSOLIDATED),
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: As the trial court used an incorrect and incomplete legal standard in determining the potential liability for asbestos related injuries of an independent contractor's employees while working on the landowners' premises, judgment in favor of said employees was vacated. But, a single landowner could not be liable for exposure caused by a contractor.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Sandcastle Realty, Inc. v. Castagna, Civil Action No. 921-S,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, April 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a real estate company would not suffer any prejudice, the defendants' motion to amend were granted, and because the company did not provide valid reasons for refusing to respond to the defendants' interrogatories and requests for production, they were ordered to respond.
|
|
| |
W. Am. Ins. Co. v. Bogush, C.A. NO. 03C-11-217-JRS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a declaratory judgment action, two parents and their daughter had an insurable interest in a car, pursuant to Del. Code Ann. tit. 18, ? 2706, that was involved in a pedestrian accident since the car had been used by the daughter as a substitute vehicle, though her uninsured boyfriend was driving it at the time of the accident.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback