 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Clough v. Interline Brands, Inc., No. 549, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for driver's employers in a negligence claim arising from a traffic accident was proper because, at the time of the accident, the driver had completed his last sales appointment for the day and was on his way home, and thus, the driver was not acting within the scope of his employment when the accident occurred.
|
|||||
| Farmers for Fairness v. Kent County, Civil Action No. 2122-CC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landowners were entitled to an injunction because, in enacting a Coastal Zone Protection Overlay Ordinance, a county levy court violated the uniformity requirements of Del. Code Ann. tit. 9, § 4902(b), thus rendering the ordinance void.
|
|||||
| LaPoint v. AmerisourceBergen Corp., Civil Action No. 327-CC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, May 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Shareholders of a corporation acquired in a merger were granted summary judgment on issues of contractual interpretation raised in the acquiring corporations' motion for summary judgment because, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the shareholders timely commenced their challenge to payments and a transaction was a bundled sale.
|
|||||
| Workers' Comp. Fund v. Indus. Accident Bd., No. 457, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A writ of prohibition was denied as the Delaware Industrial Accident Boards lack of jurisdiction was not manifestly apparent. Questions of whether the two-year limitation period began with the first payment after the second injury became permanent, and whether Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 2327 was a statute of limitation, should have been appealed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
