LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Delaware - July 29, 2005

  
Chabbott Petrosky Commer. Realtors, Ltd. v. Whelan, C.A. 02C-10-036 (JTV), SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Real estate broker was not entitled to commission, even though sellers breached listing agreement by terminating prior to expiration of exclusive listing period, because no sale occurred and only eligible offer came after agreement was terminated; agreement also lacked cancellation clause required by Md. Code Ann., Bus. Occ. & Prof. ¿ 17-534.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Coleman v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC, C.A. No. 03C-02-137 RRC, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Experts failed to support shareholders' claim that CPA firm materially overstated corporation's income and assets by understating depreciation and/or amortization of goodwill and other capital assets. Expert's testimony that there was no misstatement was not rebutted by later hypothetical that was not supported by corporation's actual records.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Del. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Medical Protective Co., C.A. No. 03C-05-023 (JTV), SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where the insurer provided malpractice coverage to the medical practice where the doctor worked, the doctor was not covered under the policy. While the acts or omissions of the doctor while working for the practice fell under the agreement, the insurer owed no duty to defend the doctor individually as the doctor was not a named insured.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
E.J. Deseta HVAC Svcs. v. Conaty, C.A. No. 04L-03-065-JRJ, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Although a contractor could correct a mistake in its mechanics' lien complaint under Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 15(a), because the statute of limitations in Del. Code Ann. tit. 25, ¿ 2711(a)(2)f., had not begun to run, the contractor could not amend the mechanics' lien judgment under Del. Code Ann. tit. 25, ¿ 2711(a)(1)b.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gronenthal v. State, No. 301, 2004, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hernandez v. Pride Court Apts. & Westminister Mgmt. Corp., CA. No. 04C-12-053, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a tenant reasonably believed that the owner of an apartment went by a name similar to the manager's name, the tenant satisfied the mistake in identity requirement of Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(3)(B), and could amend the complaint without violating the statute of limitations.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lang v. Morant, C.A. No. 99C-03-162, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where, after new trial was awarded and second verdict was entered in favor of injured party and spouse, second verdict was vacated and first trial verdict in favor of defendant was reinstated, defendant was entitled to litigation costs for first trial pursuant to Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 54(d), including expert witness testifying and travel fees.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Nave, I.D. # 006436DI, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Watson v. Watson Mortuary Serv., C.A. No. 05M-07-020, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.