 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Day v. Iomega Corp., No. 360, 1999 Consolidated with No. 511, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dismissed appeal where appellant refused to file opening brief and appendix, because appellant did not sustain his duty of diligently prosecuting appeal, and prevented the court from conducting a meaningful review.
|
|||||
| Frunzi v. Department of Pub. Safety, Div. of State Police & Unemployment Ins. Appeal Bd., C.A. No. 98A-01-010-WTQ, C.A. No. 98A-03-004-WTQ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State police officer was not entitled to reargument of his termination due to being in business with a pedophile on parole where he failed to show any possible expectation of a different result on the proffered evidence.
|
|||||
| In re ML/EQ Real Estate Pshp. Litig., Consolidated C.A. No. 15741,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for reargument was denied where class of unitholders, suing a real estate partnership, were on inquiry notice from June 1994 as to mischaracterization of loan proceeds, and their amended complaint did not relate back.
|
|||||
| Ingram v. Heiman, No. 472, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Clients failed to provide portions of trial transcript that allegedly support their claim. Superior court did not abuse its discretion in awarding law firm money for legal services or in denying a new trial with a jury.
|
|||||
| New Castle County Dep't of Land Use v. First Union Bank, No. 508, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Riley, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 22, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was granted the right to withdraw his original guilty plea based upon his challenge to the amount of restitution that he was ordered to pay to the victim.
|
|||||
| Yancey v. Bolen, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 98C-03-238-JOH,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Remittitur denied based on specific claims for damages and significant testimony about pain, distress, and depression caused by defendant's negligence; thus, court concluded jury's award was not excessive and did not shock court's conscience.
|
|||||
| Yingling v. Yingling, No. 323, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
