 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anderson v. Silicki, No. 207, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying claimant's motion for additur or new trial in a case where the jury awarded $100 to him for injuries he sustained in an auto accident, as the jury's award of damages was not so grossly out of proportion to the injuries suffered as to shock the court's conscience and sense of justice.
|
|||||
| Country Life Homes, Inc. v. Unemployment Ins. Appeal Bd., C.A. No. 06A-06-002,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A claimant was terminated from employment without just cause under Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 3315(2) as no prior warning was given to her, and her conduct did not rise to level of intentional disregard of employer's interests; instead, family illnesses, beyond her control, necessitated absence. Thus, claimant was entitled to unemployment benefits.
|
|||||
| Dittrick v. Chalfant, C.A. No. 2156-S,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Buyers were not entitled to award of attorneys' fees in contract claim because they were not prevailing party. In underlying dispute, the seller argued that the contract carried 11.75 percent interest while the buyers argued that the contract carried no interest. The court ordered interest at the statutory rate, so the buyers did not prevail.
|
|||||
| In re Petition of Watson, No. 104, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a probationer had an adequate remedy in the appellate process to seek review of a violation of probation sentence, and because a claim of counsel's ineffectiveness could be pursued by a postconviction petition under Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61; the probationer was not entitled to mandamus relief under Del. Sup. Ct. R. 43.
|
|||||
| Lawrence v. State, No. 365, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not deny defendant the right to a fair trial in violation of Del. Const. art. I, § 7, when the trial court made comments while the State was questioning a witness during defendant's fourth-degree rape trial; trial court's comments attempted to clear up confusion over an otherwise obvious question regarding location of the crime.
|
|||||
| Matoo v. State, No. 500, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions of first degree assault and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony were affirmed because the evidence was more than enough to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and the trial court found that defendant's testimony was not credible and that defendant had to have been the one who shot a victim.
|
|||||
| Shufler v. Shufler, No. 455, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
