 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barnett v. State, No. 530, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant did not contend that his sentence exceeded statutory authorization, constituted double jeopardy, or was ambiguous or contradictory, no relief was available under rule permitting correction of illegal sentence.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, No. 456, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant pled guilty knowingly and intelligently, he waived any right to attack alleged defects that preceded entry of the plea. Defendant's claim that his counsel provided ineffective assistance was without merit.
|
|||||
| Klopping v. Wilmington Trust Co., C.A. No. 98C-03-181-VAB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 24, 2000, Decided , March 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A terminated employee was not entitled to exercise his stock option plans, as his employer did not in a course of conduct allow any other employee terminated to do so. The employee was not deliberately terminated to end his stock option plan rights, and was not promised that his stock option plans could be exercised at termination.
|
|||||
| Lord v. Souder, No. 58, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of promissory estoppel and fraud claims by the employee was reversed where she alleged the employer promised protection from reprisals when it sought information about theft by her boss; employment at-will barred other claims.
|
|||||
| Sann v. Accurate Office Machs., No. 516, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee's motion to affirm judgment granted in action for unemployment benefits because ruling that appellant was discharged for just cause was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| State v. Anderson, CRIMINAL ACTION NUMBER IN-91-09-0959-R3,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, March 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convicted murderer's motions for postconviction relief, based on a misstated date in an affidavit, were denied because they were time barred and previously adjudicated unfavorably to the convicted murderer.
|
|||||
| Trustees of Arden v. Unity Constr., Court of Chancery C.A. No. 15025-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, March 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs could prove that defendant contractor's role went beyond superintendence because "participation" was more than "general superintendence," and material issues existed concerning the level of defendant's involvement.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, No. 389, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, March 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed the denial of appellant's petition for postconviction relief on the basis of the trial court's well-reasoned, thorough, 12-page decision.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
