 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Campbell v. State, No. 294, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 27, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Future drug selling evidence was properly admitted under Del. R. Evid. 404(b); it had independent logical relevance--it was material to identifying defendant as part of trafficking scheme. Probative value of identifying him as supplier outweighed prejudice of notifying jury of later bad act. Buyer was Del. R. Evid. 701-qualified to identify drug.
|
|||||
| Harris v. State, No. 66, 2009,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 27, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hartmann v. State, No. 254, 2009,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 27, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Herron v. Certainteed Corp., C.A. No. 07C-11-042 ASB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 27, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a laboratory was substantially unprepared to enter into a binding settlement prior to trial, it did not participate in compulsory alternative dispute in good faith; accordingly, sanctions were imposed against the laboratory pursuant to Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 16(f).
|
|||||
| In re Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court, No. 301,2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 27, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Based on an attorney's false notarizations, failure to pay transfer taxes, and restatement of a purchase price to reduce taxes, he committed violations of Del. Law. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), (b), and 8.4(a), (c), and (d); as the misconduct was knowing, a public reprimand, one-year suspension, and permanent practice restrictions were imposed.
|
|||||
| In re Request of the Governor, No. 150, 2009,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 27, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McLaughlin v. Dower Downs, Inc., No. 397, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 27, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a guest's counsel must have reviewed a doctor's affidavit, he would have been on notice that the doctor's opinion had no connection to the facts of the matter at issue; accordingly, the trial court was not required to conduct a Daubert hearing.
|
|||||
| State v. Fletcher, Nos. 85/147, 2008 (Consolidated),
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 27, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgments expunging delinquency adjudication records were affirmed; juvenile's status as registered sex offender, alone, did not constitute "material objection" under Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, ¿ 1001, Expungement Statute; nor did juvenile, whose sex offender record was expunged, have to maintain Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, ¿¿ 4120 and 4122 registration.
|
|||||
| Trs. of Arden v. Unity Constr. Co., C.A. No. 15025-VCN,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, May 27, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
