 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Digex S'holders Litig., Civil Action No. 18336-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, April 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where class members knew on date that settlement agreement was approved that they were not going to receive their proportional share of settlement, their later motion to intervene to assert those same concerns was untimely.
|
|||||
| Ortiz-Bernal v. Shahan, C.A. No. 2001-09-409,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Record supported hearing officer's findings that police officer had probable cause to stop a driver and that driver operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and court upheld Delaware DMV's decision to revoke driver's license.
|
|||||
| Parker v. Wilk, C.A. No. 98C-12-075-JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The injured parties could proceed on a survival claim based on loss of chance. Since they did not show both an injury and an increased risk of harm, they could not seek damages for an increased risk of harm. Nor could they assert wrongful death.
|
|||||
| Shipley v. Stocks, C.A. No. 2001-08-645,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| White v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Wilmington, C.A. No. 01A-08-005 HLA,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellants' motion for reargument was denied because the issues raised in the motion were considered by the court in making its original decision. The contentions were mere restatements of the arguments raised in appellants' appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
