 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Green v. State, No. 286, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 5, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ifriqi v. State, No. 531, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 5, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly denied his motion for post conviction relief based on an allegedly coerced guilty plea where defendant presented no evidence countering his prior indication to the trial court that the plea was not coerced.
|
|||||
| Stroud v. Forest Gate Dev. Corp., C.A. No. 20063-NC, C.A. No. 20064-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 5, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Purchasers of townhouse units were entitled to specific performance because a developer could not rely on the force majeure clause of the parties' contract where the delay in construction resulted from the actions of the developer and its agents.
|
|||||
| Salem Church (Del.) Assocs. v. New Castle County, C.A. No. 20305-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 6, 2004, Decided , May 6, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied county's motion to strike as irrelevant allegations where church contended that it should be shielded from consequences of a senate bill because of forces motivating public officials. Allegations were relevant to the grounds for relief.
|
|||||
| Sterling Prop. Holdings, Inc. v. New Castle County, C.A. No. 20408-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 6, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The county's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to the developer's complaint was granted because the developer's challenge to the local "Sunsetting Law" was commenced more than five years after the ordinance's publication.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
