 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Burton v. State, No. 343, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly ordered new jury selection in defendant's criminal prosecution after finding that defense counsel's use of peremptory challenges to all white males over the age of 40 based on their "body language" was pretextual and constituted a Batson violation; trial court's action did not deprive defendant of trial by jury.
|
|||||
| Dahl v. State, No. 422, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a dance academy taught both adults and children, the State failed to prove that it was a "school" as defined by Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 1112(b)(2); therefore, the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for a judgment of acquittal.
|
|||||
| In re Dixon, No. 101, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Seaford Golf & Country Club v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co., No. 530, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to property owner and against club on club's summary judgment cross-motion whether certain property sold and leased to club remained subject to restrictions in property owner's favor; trial court should have addressed contrary conclusion that sale of "plant" did not include sale of underlying land.
|
|||||
| Levy v. HLI Operating Co., C.A. No. 1395-VCL,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Corporation was awarded partial summary judgment on former outside directors' suit for indemnification under Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 145 because the corporation was not required to indemnify the directors for money which a stockholder that placed the directors on the corporation's board paid on their behalf in a settlement.
|
|||||
| MetCap Secs. LLC v. Pearl Senior Care, Inc., C.A. No. 2129-VCN,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 16, 2007, Decided, May 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Financial advisor's fraud, third party, and reformation claims against companies that assumed the obligations of a business entity that retained the advisor in a merger were dismissed because the companies owed the advisor no duty of disclosure, and the advisor was not a party to or third party beneficiary of the merger agreement and its amendment.
|
|||||
| State v. Walker, Cr. I.D. No. 0405000068,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the factual basis for defendant's Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(d)(3) motion was purely hypothetical, because no Batson challenge was raised during jury selection, and because he had not made the requisite showing, defendant's pro se request for a transcript was denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
