Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Delaware - June 2 - June 4, 2008
  
Gross v. Schubert, C.A. No. 07C-07-139 PLA, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 2, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Robertson v. Del., No. 428, 2007, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 2, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because defendant waived any right to challenge the constitutionality of the administrative search leading to his arrest due to his guilty plea, an appeal from his convictions was wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issue. Hence, the State's motion to affirm was granted and counsel's motion to withdraw was rendered moot.

Search Cases for Free
  
Taylor v. State, No. 421, 2007, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 2, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Brown v. State, No. 548, 2007, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Edwards v. State, No. 1, 2008, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
State v. Burton, Def ID No. 0410003743, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, June 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Gee v. State, No. 367, 2007, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 4, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's appeal of his convictions on three counts of second-degree rape was rejected; defendant could not show, as he claimed, that he was improperly indicted and defendant could not raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim for the first time on direct appeal, which meant pursuant to Del. Sup. Ct. R. 26(c) that his appeal lacked merit.

Search Cases for Free
  
In re Kingsley, No. 138, 2008, Board Case No. 31, 2007, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 4, 2008, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An attorney's actions in continuing to prepare documents for an accountant despite not being licensed in Delaware and his knowing violation of a cease and desist order violated his ethical duties and seriously undermined the legal system. His actions were in violation of Del. Law. R. Prof. Conduct 5.5 and warranted disbarment.

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.