 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Robertson v. Del., No. 428, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 2, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant waived any right to challenge the constitutionality of the administrative search leading to his arrest due to his guilty plea, an appeal from his convictions was wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issue. Hence, the State's motion to affirm was granted and counsel's motion to withdraw was rendered moot.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. State, No. 421, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 2, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Brown v. State, No. 548, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Edwards v. State, No. 1, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Burton, Def ID No. 0410003743,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, June 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gee v. State, No. 367, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 4, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal of his convictions on three counts of second-degree rape was rejected; defendant could not show, as he claimed, that he was improperly indicted and defendant could not raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim for the first time on direct appeal, which meant pursuant to Del. Sup. Ct. R. 26(c) that his appeal lacked merit.
|
|||||
| In re Kingsley, No. 138, 2008, Board Case No. 31, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 4, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney's actions in continuing to prepare documents for an accountant despite not being licensed in Delaware and his knowing violation of a cease and desist order violated his ethical duties and seriously undermined the legal system. His actions were in violation of Del. Law. R. Prof. Conduct 5.5 and warranted disbarment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
