 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bell v. Bell, No. 139, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Deangelo v. State, No. 343, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's argument that State withheld exculpatory Brady materials was rejected as State did not have information that defendant contended was withheld, and evidence did not justify missing evidence instruction. Murder conviction was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Jacobs v. State, No. 647, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, No. 525, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State had some leeway to show that defendant acquired contraband some time previous to date of charged offense, and defendant's conviction for possession of deadly weapon by person prohibited on or about specific date was not in error.
|
|||||
| Marvel v. State, No. 569, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied defendant's fourth motion for postconviction relief, as the motion was untimely and repetitive, and defendant failed to make the requisite showing to warrant application of an exception to the procedural bar.
|
|||||
| McDaniel v. State, No. 387, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where record showed that defendant's appeal was wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issue, motion to affirm trial court's judgment regarding convictions and sentence for, inter alia, robbery in first degree, was granted.
|
|||||
| Mirarchi v. Picard, C.A. No. 17495, C.A. No. 17838, C.A. No. 19018, C.A. No. 19027,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, April 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to consolidate all four actions filed by shareholders against board of directors was denied. Consolidation could not have produced economies for which it was designed. Board's motions for dismissal required separate review of cases.
|
|||||
| Pumphrey v. State, No. 206, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Veenema v. Copeland, C.A. No. 2001-01-401,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the landlords and tenants disputed when notice was given to the landlords of their new address for purposes of notice of damages and return of security deposit, summary judgment was denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
