 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beneville v. York, Civil Action No. 17638,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 10, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's derivative suit was denied, as plaintiff was excused from making shareholder litigation demand upon board because half of board was self-interested in challenged transaction.
|
|||||
| Bigby v. State, No. 287, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 10, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the notice of appeal was filed untimely, the appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Dickens v. State, No. 576, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 10, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of appeal was upheld as appellant failed to appear for the trial. The trial court had discretion to dismiss under the circumstances, and committed no legal error.
|
|||||
| Handy v. State, No. 297, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 10, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal did not file timely appeal notice as required, thereby prompting dismissal. Because court-related personnel did not cause delay, rule exception that excused untimely filing did not apply.
|
|||||
| Wilkerson v. State, No. 157, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 10, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where petitioner raised the same claim in habeas corpus petition that was rejected on direct appeal, motion for postconviction relief, and in motion for correction of sentence, petition was properly denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
