 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bakshi v. Fla. 6 Health Care Facilities, C.A. No. 00C-12-100-SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Physician's request for declaratory judgment relief was denied because service agreement governed whole relationship between the parties and required arbitration of the case, which clearly related to the contractual relationship between the parties.
|
|||||
| Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., Civil Action No. 7129,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, April 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A chancellor's award of prejudgment interest was law of the case in connection with a retrial; nothing in an appellate opinion compelled the court to question the chancellor's determination of the appropriate interest rate.
|
|||||
| Cochran v. Supinski, C.A. No. 19143,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was granted against candidates challenging election, where integrity and rationality of party's grievance committee was not disputed. There was no basis for court to overturn resolution of internal political party dispute.
|
|||||
| Div. of Family Serv. v. N.X., FILE NO.: 01-08-08TN, PETITION NO.: 01-26018,
FAMILY COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied division of family services' (DFS) petition to terminate the parents' parental rights in their son. Even though the parents were plagued by drug problems, DFS was required to, and did not, develop a meaningful reunification plan.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
