 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barnett v. YMCA of Del. Cent. Branch Mbr., LLC, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 06C-02-019-JOH,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Organization's motion to dismiss a worker's negligence claims was denied, as the health affects alleged by the worker arising from medication taken as a precaution following possible infection with AIDS while working on a building owned by the organization were more than transitory.
|
|||||
| In re Appraisal of Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc., Civil Action No. 1554-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an appraisal action, a corporation, which was involved in the development and production of pharmaceuticals, could not justify a two-tiered confidentiality order as misuse of its sensitive information would be protected by a one-tier confidentiality order and securities laws would protect it from the possibility of insider trading.
|
|||||
| State v. Bailey, I.D. No. 0205002232,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant did not present any exceptional circumstances justifying an untimely motion to suppress, the motion was denied.
|
|||||
| TCMP3 Ptnrs. LLP v. Centerpoint Corp., Civil Action No. 170-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Confidential communications contained within a mediation agreement were enforced under Del. Ch. Ct. R. 174, as said communications were between the parties and the mediator, and the parties intended to preserve the sanctity of the same.
|
|||||
| King v. Allied Sys., C.A. No. 05A-01-002 MMJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a payment log sought by an employee was not intended to be included as a medical record which an employee was entitled to inspect, copy, and reproduce pursuant to Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 2322(d), the Superior Court erroneously ordered an employer to produce the same to the employee.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
