 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Premcor Ref. Group, Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., No. 284, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 11, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because exceptional circumstances did not exist, pursuant to Del. Sup. Ct. R. 42, the insureds' motion for leave to appeal from an interlocutory ruling granting summary judgment to the insurer was denied.
|
|||||
| State v. Perkins, I.D. # 0212008942,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 11, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Sheppard, Def. ID # 0509017113,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, June 11, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Capossere v. Levine, C.A. No. 07C-08-133 JRS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 12, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Alexander, CR.A.NOS.: IN06-01-1502,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 12, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| CIT Techs. Fin. v. Owen Printing Dover, Inc., C.A. No. 06C-08-047 WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, June 13, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dawkins v. State, No. 193, 2007,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 13, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A superior court's denial of an inmate's motion for postconviction relief from his first degree murder and related convictions was affirmed where all but one claim was barred by Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(i)(3) or (4), and he could not show prejudice resulting from his counsel's alleged failure to object to the prosecutor's closing argument.
|
|||||
| Schuss v. Penfield Partners, L.P., Civil Action No. 3132-VCP,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 13, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
